The IWW and The Hobo, A History

It was an overcast and windy day on September 1st, 1908 in Portland, Oregon when a gang of twenty men dressed in matching black overalls, white shirts, and red ties gathered in a train yard. These hoboes, led by J.H. Walsh, one of the hobo community’s premier labor activists, departed on a 2,500 mile journey across the country to the “hobo capital”. They jumped on to a cattle car and rode to Seattle, where they spent a night in jail for trespassing. After this they continued to hop freight trains to their destination. This group, self-labeled as the “Overall Brigade”, was busy along the way spreading the word about revolutionary industrial unionism to every encampment, boxcar, and hobo jungle they found. But they were not headed for Washington D.C., they were headed to Chicago, for the third annual convention of the Industrial Workers of the World (IWW) was about to open.

This group of hobos were among those active in the fight for control over the union between those the Brigade dubbed the “homeguard”, a faction that wanted to use the ballot box as a path to socialism, and those who sought to reject electoral politics and labor contracts altogether. These men advocated for direct action, strikes, sabotage, and other forms of on-the-job protest as the surest way of dismantling capitalism. Those against the hobo contingent referred to them as “bummery”, theorizing that migrant and seasonal workers couldn’t be relied upon to be a revolutionary vanguard. The hoboes were ultimately successful in ousting the homeguard and dedicated the IWW to direct economic action exclusively.

As they returned to the West they did so triumphantly, with a new and independent political movement of their own, one that promised the emancipation of all labor and the expansion of what constitutes a worker. Those concerned with the new changes were worried that the traits of the hobo lifestyle (things like job shirking, binge drinking, sexual promiscuity, and family desertion) were not conducive to leading an international movement aimed at social change. In true hobo style the men rejected any attempt to repudiate these attacks on their reputations, choosing instead to revel in their lifestyles, calling themselves “sons of rest” who preferred “simple life in the jungles” to the workaday world of the homeguard. This helped to create a folklore around the hobo that outlasted the original IWW movement and the subculture from which it emerged.

The Overalls Brigade lent itself to the creation of this folklore as it toured the West Coast. Before their trip to Chicago they had organized themselves into a red-uniformed Industrial Union Band, parodying popular gospel songs and hymns for street-corner crowds. They funded their trip through the sales of ten cent song sheets with four of their most popular numbers on it.

 

Upon returning from the trip Walsh realized how well they had sold and decided to make a full length book of these parody songs. Originally titled, Songs of the Workers, on the Road, in the Jungles, and in the Shops—Songs to Fan the Flames of Discontent, the volume went through numerous editions, eventually becoming known as the Little Red Songbook. This proved to be the most important cultural artifact of the hobos of the time. Along with the stories and commentaries of the road published in the IWW’s numerous newspapers and pamphlets, the Little Red Songbook provided hoboes with a powerful set of myths to enhance its group definition, vindicate its counter-cultural status, and mobilize its members for political action. The impact of this propaganda was swift and far-reaching. “Where a group of hoboes sit around a fire under a railroad bridge,” noted Carleton Parker in 1914, “many of them can sing I.W.W. songs without a book.”

The IWW turned boxcars into organizing spaces as thousands rode freight trains moving through the wheat harvests of the Great Plains. From International Socialist Review, June, 1915 .

This folklore helped them to solidify an identity to unify around. It also advanced the idea that hoboes were actually more revolutionary than their stationary counterparts. Unfortunately, this myth held the IWW back in organizing women, African Americans, Mexican Americans, and a whole host of immigrant groups from Europe and Asia. These identities were not seen as important as class, and this lead to the IWW relegating these groups to a supporting role in the hobo’s revolution. The IWW’s decades-long control over the hobo community and its myths delivered a certain subculture to the heart of American labor activism, but it also venerated the hobo as a manly white pioneer of the industrial West.

Organizing the Main Stem

The street in a town where hoboes tend to congregate is known as the “main stem”. This was the space that the Overall Brigade staked out as the headquarters for its revolution. These communities were drawn to these districts because of the anonymity and freedom from supervision. This also attracted Wobblies as a place to spread their message without worrying about employer interference. After returning from their trip Walsh began a campaign of soapboxing in order to recruit over a thousand members to Spokane’s IWW local, establishing an organizing model for others to follow. Tactics such as singing, street theater, jokes, parodies, and fiery sermons were soon adopted by Wobblies all over the West.

This bold claim to the main stem as a venue for public participation in revolutionary ideas was stiffly contested by local city officials. Walsh’s organizing was obviously very high-profile and this sparked heavy debate over the use of public urban space. Walsh also effectively used this organizing to boycott local employment agencies, causing the city to ban street-corner orations. In response, hundreds of Wobbly hoboes hitched rides to Spokane in order to defy the ban and serve their time in prison. The goal was to flood the jails with so many Wobblies that the city couldn’t arrest them all.

Free speech protesters face fire hoses in San Diego, 1912. Photo: UW Libraries

The City of Spokane bent to the demands of the protesters by March 1910, but similar “free speech fights”, as they were to be known, were breaking out all over the West. For the most part these campaigns were not aimed at protecting American civil liberties or the First Amendment. Instead, Wobblies fought for the collective autonomy of the hoboes and to challenge the stranglehold that the employers and the recruiting agencies played in the hobo job market. The process of city bans followed by an influx of Wobblies looking to get arrested was repeated over and over again, in San Diego, CA, Everett, WA, Fresno, CA, and even here in Aberdeen, WA.

 

 

But the actions of the Wobblies wasn’t just free speech fights with cities and marking out the main stem as their territory, they also focused heavily on delivering basic services to their members. Strategically located in the heart of the main stem, IWW halls offered kitchens, beds, reading rooms, employment information, and large meeting halls, where hoboes congregated on a nightly basis. Wobbly halls were seen more as places to curl up with a blanket and get a light, a stove, and companionship rather than a place to direct the union operations. In prohibition states, the IWW halls served as the only social substitute for the saloon.

By establishing themselves in the main stems of the West, these Wobblies were challenging city officials, the chamber of commerce, employment agencies, and crucially the popular commercial life of the main stem. The IWW actively strove to compete for the attention and money of hoboes with what they saw as “permanent dens of vice which smell to heaven, and which line the streets of the tenderloin quarter, and which need a thorough fumigation like that dealt out to Sodom and Gomorrah.” This according to the Industrial Worker, the IWW newspaper.

The IWW tried to respond to the perceived need for cultural uplift by putting on programming that attracted intellectuals and bohemians from bordering neighborhoods, interested in the cultural activity being put on by the IWW. Things such as films, concerts, plays, lectures, debates, and discussion groups found a ready home next to the all important radical bookstores that helped stimulate the intellectual life of the main stem. “In every large city there are hobo book stores which make a specialty of radical periodicals,” explained one migratory, “for even if the hobo does not generally belong to a socialistic society, he has been taught to think about class struggle. He may read the Hobo News, or he may read Jack London, or the Masses, or the Industrial Standard.”

These bookstores did far more than just sell books though. They served as replacements for the saloon, restaurant, and even in some cases lodging house. They also mostly all served as meeting spaces for radicals. Such cultural attraction often evolved into centers for labor organizing and radical agitation attracting all manner of intellectuals, artists, poets, and performers. But by far the most popular venues for raising voices of discontent were the public parks. Pershing Square in Los Angeles, Pioneer Square in Seattle, and Washington Square in Chicago were all important hobo resorts, especially during temperate spring and summer months. These hoboes spent their days listening to soapboxers in the parks across the West and Midwest. Most of the speakers were preaching about radical notions, but many proselytized from the Bible, trying to save the souls of the damned hoboes. Walsh and his Industrial union Band were formed to drown out these Christian preachers, and one of the main foes of the Wobblies on the main stem was the Salvation Army.

Alongside the spoken word the written word helped in spreading the ideas of the IWW on the streets of the West. Wobblies are famous for their many pamphlets and newspapers, the most important is undoubtedly the Industrial Worker published by the Spokane local. The newspaper featured local lodging houses, coffee shops, and second hand clothing stores, field guides for hoboes with prominent roads, jungles, and worksites, and tips on local judges, residents, train crews, and police forces around the West. Virtually every issue also featured “slave market news” that reported not only on the amount of hiring being done on a given main stem, but also on the hours, wages, job conditions, and fees that migratories could expect to find there. In doing so they wrested control over the supply of labor at the work camps, thus laying the groundwork for future direct action in the field.

This sketch and poem about “The Blanket Stiff” who “built the ROAD” was reprinted from another newspaper on page 1 of the Industrial Worker, April 23, 1910, p1

It was not until 1913 that workplace activism began to show its face in the worksites of the West. The fieldwork began in California when “camp delegates” departed the main stems of Redding, Sacramento, Fresno, Bakersfield, Los Angeles, and San Francisco to recruit seasonal laborers on the job. Delegates swept through the orchards, harvest fields, and forests of the Central Valley and Sierra Nevada spreading propaganda and attempting to organize the floating army of “wage slaves.”

Bolstering these efforts was the notorious Wheatland hop pickers strike at E. B. Durst’s ranch near Marysville, California, in August 1913. This strike, led by several Wobbly hoboes who spoke for the multinational workforce of twenty-eight hundred, ended in a shoot-out that left four men dead, including a district attorney, a deputy sheriff, and two workers. In the wake of Wheatland, and the sentencing to life imprisonment of two Wobblies charged with murder, forty new IWW locals opened and one hundred soapboxers marched up and down the state signing up thousands of new members. Wobblies were notorious for disrupting normal labor camp routines, finding any excuse to agitate fellow workers on the job. “They stand on a nail keg and organize a strike,” remarked one employer, “and inside of a day one of them hits camp, hell’s a-poppin’.”

Despite this apparent victory, real on-the-job power being in the hands of hoboes was still a very long way off. In the Midwest Wobblies began to focus on delivering these material gains to workers. In April 1915 IWW delegates at special conference of harvest district locals voted to form the Agricultural Workers’ Organization (AWO), which soon became headquartered in an old cheap hotel building in Minneapolis’s Gateway district. The AWO used the tactics from California of mobile delegates traveling from town to town to organize harvesters, but this time focused on concrete issues of wages, hours, and working conditions. This lead to a sharp increase in the number of new members being signed up, with hundreds per week in 1915, a rate that would be topped in 1916 and 1917. The AWO was successful at transforming the whole industry of harvest migration, not only securing gains on the job but also ridding the jungles and boxcars of gamblers, stick-up artists, and extortionist railroad police. As they swelled to 70,000 members by 1917 the AWO expanded its operations into the lumber and mining industries of Montana, Idaho, and the Pacific Northwest.

The IWW had infused hobo subculture with political zeal. “To-day if you will get into a box car and meet a crowd of hoboes,” Ben Reitman wrote sometime after 1915, “you will almost imagine that you are in the Socialist or I.W.W. meeting.” Because of the IWW, he added, “the hobo has evolved from a despised shiftless creature to a powerful useful man.”

End of An Era

This dramatic rise in popularity of the IWW and its radical messages prompted an equally dramatic reaction from the local employers and law enforcement officials. As the United States entered the first World War in 1917, a war the Wobblies heavily denounced. This opposition to the war gave employers and their law enforcement agents the cover they needed to launch a massive counteroffensive against the union, accusing Wobblies of being traitors and even spies. Wobblies were also attacked by various vigilante groups allied with local police on numerous occasions because of their prominent role in many strikes that curtailed wartime lumber and copper production. These attacks laid the groundwork needed for the so called “Big Pinch” of September 5, 1917, when US Justice Department agents simultaneously raided IWW headquarters, halls, and private homes around the country. The agents seized virtually all the union’s records and property and arrested one hundred members under federal espionage laws. This was followed by prosecutions under newly passed state and federal sedition and criminal syndicate statues which saw leading Wobblies sent ot jail or hiding underground. The infamous Palmer Raids of 1919 and the virulent Red Scare that followed further inhibited Wobbly activities. By 1920 this once premier hobo organization stood on the verge of collapse.

Statements by three young men who claimed that train crews required them to have IWW cards to ride boxcars in Washington state, obtained by U.S. Marshal, Western District, WA, in 1922.

In another sense, however, the crackdown against dissenters in general and the IWW in particular marked the beginning of a longstanding effort to resettle white men back into steady jobs and stable homes. This attempt at “welfare capitalism” in the 1920s did not entirely succeed, but it did provide a blueprint for later efforts. The main stem was in decline as early as 1919. Employment agencies were shutting down, and large-scale workingmen’s hotels no longer found financing. The population aged, and for the first time people began referring to the main stem as “skid row.” Folklorists even began to collect the songs, stories, and jargon of hoboes, who, as one folklorist put it, were “anachronisms bound for extinction.”

Yet it must be said that in its day the IWW was the most advanced working-class organization the United States had yet produced. The IWW wrote one of the most inspiring and brilliant chapters of the workers movement in the United States. A forerunner of events to come, the legacy of the IWW contains much that is imperative for the contemporary labor movement to relearn, with its rejection of racism and anti-immigrant sentiment, its emphasis on building power on the shop floor through the mobilization of the rank and file, and its radical appeal to the urgency and necessity of solidarity. An 1914 article published in the IWW’s publication Solidarity declared,

The nomadic worker of the West embodies the very spirit of the IWW. His cheerful cynicism, his frank and outspoken contempt for most of the conventions of bourgeois society. . .make him an admirable exemplar of the iconoclastic doctrines of revolutionary unionism. His anamolous (sic) position, half industrial slave, half vagabond adventurer leaves him infinitely less servile than his fellow worker in the East. Unlike the factory slave of the Atlantic seaboard and the central states he is most emphatically not “afraid of his job.” No wife and family encumber him. The worker of the East, oppressed by the fear of want for wife and babies, dare not venture much.


 

Sources:

Citizen Hobo: How a Century of Homelessness Shaped America by Todd DePastino, published by the University of Chicago Press. ©2003 by The University of Chicago.

https://isreview.org/issue/86/legacy-iww/index.html

https://press.uchicago.edu/Misc/Chicago/143783in.html

https://depts.washington.edu/iww/wobbly_trains.shtml#_edn1

J.H. Walsh, “IWW ‘Red Special’ Overalls Brigade,” Industrial Union Bulletin,September 19, 1908, 1.

David Arthur Walters, “The 1908 Red Special Campaign,” AuthorsDen.com, July 26, 2005.

J.H. Walsh, “IWW ‘Red Special’ Overalls Brigade.”

J.H. Walsh, “IWW ‘Red Special’ Overall Brigade,” Industrial Union Bulletin,September 19, 1908, 1.

J.H. Walsh, “Abroad in the Nation,” Industrial Union Bulletin, October 24, 1908, 1-3.

“IWW Newspapers,” Mapping American Social Movements Through the 20th Century. 

Melvyn Dubofsky, We Shall Be All: A History of the IWW (New York: Quadrangle, 1969), 86-87.

No title. Solidarity, November 21, 1914, 2-3.

Paul F. Brissenden, The IWW: A Study of American Syndicalism (New York: Russell & Russell Inc., 1920), 262.

Oliver Janders, “IWW Yearbook: 1909,” The IWW History Project, http://depts.washington.edu/iww/yearbook1909.shtml#_edn23

Greg Hall, Harvest Wobblies (Corvallis: Oregon State University Press, 2001), 61.

Janders, “IWW Yearbook: 1909.”

“Another Free Speech Fight Go to Fresno,” Industrial Worker, September 3, 1910, 1.

“On the Road to Fresno,” Industrial Worker, April 6, 1911, 4.

Dubofsky, We Shall Be All, 190.

Roger N. Baldwin, “Free Speech Fights of the IWW,” Twenty-Five Years of Industrial Unionism (The Industrial Workers of the World: 1930), n.p.

“Fifth IWW Convention.” Solidarity, June 11, 1910, 3.

Charles Ashleigh, “The Floater,” International Socialist Review 15, (1914): 37.

Richard Reese, “The A.W.O. – An Example of a Successful Union,” Solidarity, March 18, 1916.

Frank Tobias Higbie, Indispensable Outcasts (Urbana and Chicago: University of Illinois Press, 2003), 153.

“Harvest Hands Must Protect Themselves,” Solidarity, October 09, 1915, 1.

“Did ‘Brakies’ Hold Them Up? No, They Were IWW’s,” Solidarity, December 25, 1914, 4.

Harry Howard, “A Sample of ‘Justice’ for IWW Members,” Solidarity, January 13, 1917, 3.

Greg Hall, Harvest Wobblies: The Industrial Workers of the World and Agricultural Laborers in the American West, 1905-1930 (Corvallis: Oregon State University Press, 2001, 4.

The Aberdeen IWW Is Back

After nearly one hundred years, we have returned to the Harbor to reclaim what is ours…our labor.

With the re chartering of the Aberdeen IWW we intend to bring back the wobbly labor organizing that is our tradition here. Aberdeen has a long and powerful history of IWW organizing, a history we honor and build upon. The goal of the IWW is, as always, to create a world in which workers have direct control over their labor. It is our goal locally to expand the definitions of who should have control over their time and energy beyond the traditional “worker”. It is our hope that our organizing can benefit those living on the streets, those without employment, and those who cannot work. We do not fetishize the position of the “worker” as an end in itself, but seek to liberate our very time from the exploitation of the ruling class. Only once all have what they need will we be satisfied. Until then we agitate, educate, and organize for a better future.

We intend to study and learn from our past struggles on the Harbor and do not intend to be ran out of town again. We mean to remember those lost to the industries that built this city and the fights against the bosses that took place here 100 years ago. Through this we will reclaim a place on the Harbor for radical labor organizing, reminding the workers here who has the power. Reminding them of their exploitation at the hands of their bosses, and reminding them that there is a better way.

Selected from From Red Harbor, by Aaron Goings:

In the first four decades of the 20th century thousands of workers in Grays Harbor either joined or supported the IWW. The region also experienced a series of epic labor struggles, frequently led by the IWW. Thousands of men and women labored in Grays Harbor’s lumber industry during the early twentieth century, performing the work necessary to allow the region’s industry to reach such impressive heights. Early twentieth century lumber workers labored long hours in treacherous conditions for low wages. Until strikes led by the IWW forced Pacific Northwest lumber employers to grant the eight-hour day, lumber workers worked ten hours per day as a rule.

The IWW found strength among Grays Harbor’s immigrant workers who struggled to survive in an industry where low wages, long hours, and dangerous working conditions were the rule.Thousands of immigrants joined thousands more native-born workers to perform the paid and unpaid labor that enabled Grays Harbor to become the world’s lumber capital. Aberdeen, Hoquiam, and Cosmopolis each had their own ethnic communities, complete with a diverse array of immigrants and immigrant families, immigrant-owned institutions such as restaurants and newspapers, and rich sets of social and cultural activities based, as often as not, around the group’s meeting halls.

During the first decades of the twentieth century, Grays Harbor had one of the most densely unionized workforces in the Pacific Northwest. Still, the local trade union movement did not represent the local working class as a whole. Instead, the dozens of craft unions that comprised the movement during its first dozen years were designed to represent a small group of privileged workers in selected industries. African Americans, Native Americans, Asian Americans, women, and so-called “new immigrants” who hailed from southern and eastern European nations, represented only a small minority of union member.

The IWW stepped into the vast void created by the region’s trade unions, promising to organize workers regardless of race, sex, or skill. But the Wobblies were not merely more open (or “industrial”) versions of AFL-style craft unions. Instead, the Wobblies were (and are) committed to challenging capitalism itself, working to break the chains of industrial bondage. In June 1905, a collection of socialists, anarchists, militant unionists, and other labor radicals met in Chicago to found the Industrial Workers of the World (IWW), an industrial union (a term that contrasted with “craft union” and meant a union that included unskilled workers as well as skilled craft workers) and a revolutionary organization. The IWW hoped to organize all workers, regardless of race, sex, or skill, into “One Big Union.” They advocated for workers to use direct action on the job, such as strikes, sabotage, and slowdowns, rather than political or electoral action. Wobblies understood that capitalism is an inherently exploitative system, one in which workers and employers are locked in a perpetual struggle in which both sides seek to gain at the other’s expense. In other words, the Wobblies understood that workers desire the full fruits of their labor, while employers want a free hand to extract as much wealth as possible.

In Grays Harbor the Wobblies organized primarily among lumber workers, establishing their first local in Hoquiam in early 1907. The local IWW grew dramatically during the Aberdeen Free Speech Fight of November 1911 to January 1912, when IWWs joined Harbor socialists in their successful efforts to overturn a municipal law banning left-wing political speeches in Aberdeen’s downtown. Efforts by Wobblies to establish a stronghold on the Harbor triggered a six-month-long coordinated attack on the radicals by Grays Harbor employers and agents of the state. Employers formed citizens’ committees – members hailed from local chambers of commerce – in Aberdeen and Hoquiam to disrupt and remove the IWW presence on the Harbor. The vigilante groups arrested and jailed activists, used fire hoses to disperse their meetings, sought to “starve out” strikers by refusing them credit at local merchants, imposed exorbitant fines for minor criminal offenses, deported activists from town, violently assaulted them with clubs and firearms, and raided and closed their halls. The Hoquiam Citizens’ Committee armed itself with shotguns and clubs, and formed a cavalry to ride down the strikers.

Read More